AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Jump in the line harry belafonte midi11/7/2022 ![]() Since Thunderbolt bandwidth is dual-channel (duplex) 10GBPS per port, there won't be any affect when adding devices to the chain. That have more than one port, so they can be daisy chained with other Thunderbolt peripherals. Since Displayport is built into Thunderbolt, monitor manufacturers will be coming out with displays Of course, these devices won't transfer data any faster than their underlying technology. You can expect to see Thunderbolt peripherals such as port replicator docks with USB3, eSata, Firewire400 and 800 to enable you to use legacy devices on the Thunderbolt bus. It combines a PCI-e bus and a Displayport bus. Thunderbolt can have up to six devices connected to each port. It uses electrical connections for cabling up to 10 feet and optical cables for longer cable runs. ![]() Thunderbolt was developed by Intel and Apple (to replace Firewire, displayport, eSATA and USB). Quotefirewire800 and is the fastest data transfer out there for pc/mac (without lets say an optical audio interface), so why not use this method instead?įirewire 800 is not "the fastest data transfer out there". I know this is a bit off topic, but I think it bears mention here, because Firewire 800 was mentioned as the best MIDI data transfer conduit, and it is already obsolete. #Jump in the line harry belafonte midi driverswell, its my little theory but i really do believe that these faster connections and decent drivers for them of course will make all the difference for keyboardists and midi guitarists in a daw environment. and roland/others dont admit to it on specifications. so just imagine how slow that usb1.0 really is! theres just not enough power for high quality softsynths using a 1.0 connection. just because (lets say firewire for example) can transfer up to 800, most motherboards are so overrun and split the resources so that your only getting 150 of that a second instead. especially in windows- the motherboard eats up everything in sight. but when you start using VST's running 600MB of memory, sometimes mine get up to 1200 which still isnt really even alot, once the midi is in the signal it still takes time, resources and power to trigger digital audio accurately. midi data is simple and doesnt require much other then a good pitch to midi detection. im pretty sure something like that and possibly the fishman wireless (if its 2.0) can control digital audio with way better results. and he got it to transfer midi, built into the guitar without a box no less. #Jump in the line harry belafonte midi windowsi dont think windows even supported firewire in 2004 for one thing. Wonder how well the paradise ran in a live setup. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |